Online identities
Examine relevant public profiles, handles, publications, and other digital traces in the context of the investigation.
Blockchain activity is one part of the story.
We connect on-chain evidence with public records and digital footprints to investigate the people, organisations, and infrastructure linked to a case.
Discuss an attribution enquiryEach connection needs context. Our work focuses on corroboration and careful interpretation.
Examine relevant public profiles, handles, publications, and other digital traces in the context of the investigation.
Research available company records and public associations to understand relevant organisational relationships.
Investigate publicly available information about websites, domains, and services connected with the activity.
Assess how public identities, transaction activity, and other case evidence may relate to one another.
Compare dates and public activity with fund movements to test whether a proposed connection is supported.
Evaluate source quality, conflicting information, and alternative explanations before drawing conclusions.
Attribution findings should explain how a connection was reached and how strongly the evidence supports it.
Relevant public records and findings brought together around the agreed investigative questions.
An explanation of the records and observations that support a relationship or attribution.
Unconfirmed leads remain identified as leads. Gaps and conflicting evidence are made explicit.
A public profile or shared transaction pattern is not, on its own, proof of identity or wrongdoing. We do not guarantee that the person controlling a wallet can be identified. Our conclusions reflect the evidence available.
Tell us what happened.
Let’s work out what the evidence can tell us.
Start with a brief overview;
we’ll discuss the evidence needed next.